
Photo by Noah Graham/NBAE via Getty Images
Let’s get this out of the way. Dwight Howard being traded to the Los Angeles Lakers will be the best thing to happen to his career.
Once it became clear that Dwight’s time in Orlando was over, with that stark realization coming when Stan Van Gundy calmly and infamously revealed to the masses that Dwight wanted him fired while speaking to the media at shootaround before a regular season game against the New York Knicks in early April, thus irreparably damaging Dwight’s relationship with the Magic, that’s when it seemed obvious that Dwight needed to leave Orlando and make Los Angeles his new home.
Magic fans may take umbrage with that line of thinking, considering that old wounds have reopened with Dwight becoming the second franchise center in Magic history to join the Lakers in a span of 16 years — indirectly following in the footsteps of Shaquille O’Neal. But let’s think about where Dwight is currently at in his career. He’s a three-time Defensive Player of the Year and top five player in the NBA that a.) took a step back in 2012 after an MVP-caliber season in 2011, b.) has yet to reach his full potential, and c.) is still seeking his first title with eight seasons wrapped under his belt. In a lot of ways, Los Angeles represents the ideal situation for him.
How?
There are many reasons, like Dwight being surrounded by the best teammates he’s ever had or getting to play for a prestigious franchise that knows how to build a winner, but there are three primary reasons: Mike Brown, Kobe Bryant, and Steve Nash.
Brown, Kobe, and Nash represent a perfect convergence of elements, in which the building blocks are there for Dwight to fully (and finally) realize his full potential.






Aug 31
The great debate between Dwight Howard and Shaquille O’Neal
Commentary
by Danny Nowell
at 4:40 pmPhoto by Gary Bassing/Getty Images
There was a time when Shaq comparisons were the sine qua non of discussion about Dwight Howard. The inane squawking about the “Superman” nickname, the alternating faux cattiness and faux chumminess with which the two interacted, the fan arguments over whether Howard’s legacy would ever eclipse O’Neal’s. It’s a tailor-made barstool argument, with enough concrete connections between the two players to make it seem like a natural argument but without any way to reasonably conclude it.
Recently, of course, the tenor or the conversation surrounding Howard has changed. The national audience is not watching him and waiting for him to “figure this thing out” and ascend to greatness. Fans are tired of him. Inevitably, that fatigue has colored the perception of his on-court exploits. All of a sudden, arguments are in the air about whether teams would rather have Andrew Bynum (that paragon of “stability and selflessness”).
Meanwhile, Shaq has transitioned from the league’s present into its past, his titanic accomplishments now sepiafied and mythologized.
In some ways, the comparisons between Shaq and Howard could never work out for Dwight (in some ways, of course, that’s exactly why Shaq so aggressively courted them). O’Neal dominated the game in the most visible ways; Dwight often dominates a game where fans aren’t watching. Where Shaq was a colossal, overwhelming inevitability, Howard is an air raid.
The discipline Shaq never displayed in his conditioning he saved for the zealous defense of his own legacy. In fact, the biggest reason why there will never be another Shaq is because no player will ever expend the same energy to cultivate a similar image.
When I started to collect my thoughts for this post, I was prepared to write that Howard, for all his steadfast excellence, has never approached the hammer-of-God dominance of Shaq. Watch the 53 points Shaq hangs on Minnesota in his Orlando days. Try and recall ever feeling similarly about Dwight.
Those are some of my favorite highlights on YouTube. Shaq looms over every play; seeing him still with a young and lithe body reminds me that he is perhaps the functionally largest person to ever play basketball. His overwhelming enormity is matched by an aggression around the rim that borders on disdain for anyone trying to guard him. I get giddy watching those highlights.
That, I was prepared to write, was the difference between Shaq and Dwight. Dwight has never been able to so fully arouse my awe.
But then I watched a few Dwight performances like this one and I began to wonder how much I could trust my own recollections.
Read the rest of this entry »
This post has no tag
1 comment